That's why we accept difficult and complex immigration litigation cases.
Our success rate is very high due to our in-depth understanding of the cases, legal research, and analysis.
We have extensive experience and legal skills to represent you.
Case 1
Iqbal v. Bryson , 604 F.Supp.2d 822, 826 (E.D. Va. 2009)(holding that a New York Pretrial Diversion Agreement under which an alien had accepted responsibility—but had made "no other reference to the facts underlying the charges"—was not a "conviction").
This case drew a line regarding the interpretation of “conviction” for immigration purposes. A non-US citizen who was placed by a NY State court into a pretrial diversion program, was deemed not convicted for immigration purposes, when he accepted responsibility, but no other underlaying facts were admitted.
Case 2
Narine v. Holder, 559 F.3d 246, 248 n.1 (4th Cir. 2009).“An alien's waiver of his appellate rights must be ‘knowingly and intelligently made.’For an alien in immigration court to waive his appeal rights, his renunciation must be knowing and intelligently made.
Copyright © 2024 Madison Law - All Rights Reserved.
Powered by GoDaddy Website Builder
We use cookies to analyze website traffic and optimize your website experience. By accepting our use of cookies, your data will be aggregated with all other user data.